Manus AI: Is This New AI Agent Better Than Devin?

Why “Talking AI” Is No Longer Enough

I already use ChatGPT daily.
I’ve tested Claude, Gemini, and more AI tools than I can remember.

This Manus AI agent review is based on real usage, not demos or marketing claims.

But here’s the real problem no one likes to admit: hey don’t actually do the work.

If you’re a developer, DevOps engineer, or even a solo founder, your day isn’t spent chatting.
It’s spent opening dashboards, running commands, fixing broken YAML files, checking logs, and repeating the same steps again and again.

Over the last 48 hours, I’ve been deep inside the Manus AI Agent review ecosystem, trying to answer one simple question:

Is Manus AI just another hyped AI agent — or is this the first tool that actually behaves like a junior engineer?

What I found surprised me.

What Is Manus AI Agent?

Most websites describe Manus AI as a “general-purpose AI agent” and stop there.

That description doesn’t help.

Manus AI Agent Review

AI Chatbots vs Manus AI Agent (The Real Difference)

Chatbots:

  • Wait for your input
  • Respond with text
  • Forget context easily
  • Cannot act independently

Traditional chatbots still serve a purpose, especially for creative or conversational tasks.

AI Agents (like Manus AI):

  • Understand goals, not just prompts
  • Navigate websites on their own
  • Use tools (browsers, terminals, APIs)
  • Execute multi-step tasks without babysitting

Manus AI doesn’t just answer you.

It plans → executes → verifies → fixes mistakes — very similar to how a real human engineer works.

That’s the key difference most reviews miss.

If you’re new to this space, understanding agent-based systems is essential.

How Manus AI Agent Review Actually Works

Here’s what makes Manus AI interesting from a technical perspective:

  • It breaks your request into subtasks
  • Each subtask is executed using the appropriate tool
  • It observes the result
  • If something fails, it retries with a modified approach

This is not just a wrapper around an LLM.

It’s closer to an autonomous task execution system with reasoning loops.

That’s why it feels slower than ChatGPT sometimes — but also why it’s far more useful for real work.

The DevOps Angle: Why Developers Should Care

This is where Manus AI quietly outshines most AI tools.

Manus AI Live web

Real-World DevOps Use Cases I Tested

1. Automating Cloud Deployments

Manus AI for DevOps automation can:

  • Read your cloud provider docs
  • Generate Terraform or cloud-init configs
  • Validate dependencies
  • Fix errors when deployment fails

It doesn’t just generate code — it deploys and debugs.

2. Writing and Testing Kubernetes Manifests

Instead of just spitting YAML:

  • It checks for invalid fields
  • Adjusts resource limits
  • Explains why a pod failed
  • Suggests production-safe defaults

This alone can save hours for small teams.

3. Log Scanning and Auto-Fixing

One underrated feature:

  • It scans logs
  • Detects common failure patterns
  • Applies known fixes automatically

This feels less like AI and more like a junior SRE that never gets tired.

Why Manus AI Is Better for Automation Than Standard LLMs

Traditional LLMs:

  • Stop at advice
  • Need manual execution
  • Can’t verify success

Manus AI:

  • Executes commands
  • Observes outcomes
  • Iterates until completion

This makes it especially useful for:

  • Solo developers
  • Startup teams
  • Indie SaaS founders

If you hate context switching, this tool matters.

Manus AI vs Devin Comparison

FeatureManus AIDevin AI
Task ExecutionYesYes
SpeedModerateFaster
Coding AccuracyHigh (iterative fixes)High
Tool UsageBrowser + TerminalMostly code-focused
DevOps TasksStrongLimited
Public AvailabilityWaitlistVery limited

The Real Verdict

  • Independent developers → Manus AI makes more sense
  • Large enterprise teams → Devin may scale better internally

Manus AI feels more flexible. Devin feels more controlled.

The “Secret” to Getting Early Access to Manus AI

Most people just sign up and wait.

That’s not enough.

Step-by-Step Waitlist Strategy

  1. Join the Manus AI Discord
  2. Participate in technical discussions (not “pls give access”)
  3. Share real workflows you want to automate
  4. Mention Manus AI experiments on Twitter/X
  5. Tag the official account with actual insights

They’re not looking for hype — they’re looking for serious users.

3 Powerful Manus AI Prompts (Copy-Paste Ready)

Prompt 1: Monitoring Dashboard

Build a full-stack monitoring dashboard using Prometheus and Grafana.
Deploy it on Docker, verify metrics collection, and fix any runtime errors.

Prompt 2: Kubernetes Debugging

Analyze this Kubernetes deployment failure.
Scan logs, identify the root cause, and update the manifest with a working fix.

Prompt 3: Cloud Cost Optimization

Review my AWS architecture and suggest cost optimizations.
Apply changes safely and verify no service downtime.

These prompts work because they focus on goals, not instructions.

For a deeper breakdown of how Manus AI works under the hood, this guide explains it well.

FAQs – Manus AI Agent Review

What makes Manus AI different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Manus AI is designed as an AI agent that executes tasks rather than just responding with text. Unlike chatbots, it can plan actions, use tools, and retry tasks when something fails.

Is Manus AI suitable for DevOps and infrastructure work?

Yes. Manus AI for DevOps use cases includes log analysis, deployment troubleshooting, and infrastructure automation, making it more practical than standard LLMs for technical workflows.

How is Manus AI different from Devin AI?

The Manus AI vs Devin difference lies in flexibility. Manus AI focuses on general task execution across tools, while Devin is more structured and optimized for controlled coding environments.

Can beginners use Manus AI effectively?

Beginners can use Manus AI, but it works best when goals are clearly defined. It’s more effective for users who understand basic workflows and can evaluate execution results.

How can I get Manus AI early access?

Manus AI early access is primarily granted through the official waitlist, with higher chances for users who actively engage in feedback, technical discussions, or real-world use cases.

My Final Verdict: Is Manus AI Worth the Hype?

Yes, if:

  • You want AI that actually does things
  • You work with DevOps, infra, or backend systems
  • You’re tired of copy-pasting commands manually

Maybe wait, if:

  • You only need writing or brainstorming
  • You don’t want experimental tools
  • You expect instant perfection (it still makes mistakes)

Manus AI isn’t magical.

But it’s the first AI agent that feels genuinely useful, not just impressive in demos.

And that’s why I’ll keep using it.

1 thought on “Manus AI: Is This New AI Agent Better Than Devin?”

Leave a Reply